7mm mag vs 300 win mag long range
Cartridge dimensions edit, the 7mm Remington Magnum has.31 ml (82 grain ) H2O cartridge case capacity.
If you look around the internet long enough, you will find that there are circles of devout followers and also unbelievers in the.300 Win Mag for various reasons.
While there are general rules of thumb for what is required, nothing is set in stone, and as we just mentioned, there is more involved than just bullet energies.Prescott, AZ: Wolfe Publishing.Regulated countries every rifle cartridge combo has to be proofed at 125 of this maximum.I.P.If youre interested in the averages, the 7mm Rem Mag has an average.56 while the 300 Win Mag has an average.553.A mature bull moose is going to require more penetration than a whitetail deer.Lets run a quick ballistic comparison and see the tale of the tape.Weight is only a part.C.Each cartridge has cheaper boxes of ammunition and each has more expensive boxes.
It also means that if you look around at handloading websites, you are going to see numbers that sometimes vastly outperform the rounds we will be looking at in this article.
More than enough to have a good feel for their strengths and their weaknesses.
The amount of energy ria promo code for debit card that is required to bring down game varies from animal to animal.
The 7mm (.284-inch) bullet drops less at all ranges even though the.308-inch bullet has a more efficient, minimum drag.C.
The sectional density correlates with the amount of penetration a bullet will have on the target, and since we are not looking at bullet types and designs in this article, we think the SD is a good means of comparison for two cartridges.
As will the toronto maple leafs win the stanley cup the names imply, the.300 Win Mag takes a 30-cal (.308) bullet, while the 7mm Rem Mag takes a smaller caliber (.284) bullet.
If we look at some of the ballistics data such as the ballistic coefficients and the trajectories, there is not a whole lot of difference between the two cartridges in either category.Before we list some of these differences between the averages of the two cartridges, its important to keep in mind the applications you plan to use one or both cartridges for.The commercially rarer 7mm Remington Short Action Ultra Magnum cartridge, a rebated rim bottlenecked centerfire short magnum introduced in 2002, is probably the other closest ballistic twin of the 7mm Remington Magnum.A rule of thumb that a lot of shooters go by is that of recoil energy can influence the shot and even be uncomfortable for some shooters.We have compiled the G1(for comparison of all bullet types) ballistic coefficients for each of the ten rounds and listed them university of chicago bookstore promo code here.This is because in shorter,.e., sporter, barrels, of approximately 22 inches (559 mm the cartridge ballistics deteriorate to much the same as those achieved.270 Winchester, while generating more recoil and muzzle blast than the.270 Winchester.The higher the BC, the better the bullet can cut through the wind, meaning it resists drag and wind drift much more efficiently than a bullet with a lower.And for hunters, where you might not have all the time in the world to take a shot, the fewer variables you have to account for the better.To some these numbers arent going have any sway in their decision.Since these two cartridges were nearly identical in their BCs, lets see if the same trend continues when you look at the short and long range trajectories.Improved cartridge extraction reliability is desirable while hunting dangerous game, which would be of concern when needing a fast follow up shot.We also do not see any trend towards one cartridge having a flatter trajectory than the other.Its really more about picking the correct round rather than the correct cartridge.Its all nitpicking.